VOO vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VOO returned 24.91% vs 31.62% for NUKZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

VOO vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 7.72% return.

VOO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 8.77%
• 1Y: 24.91%
• 3Y*: 21.45%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: 15.35%

NUKZ

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: 3.81%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.72%	17.82%	22.50%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.72%	56.57%	60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and NUKZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.65

The correlation between VOO and NUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOO	NUKZ
Technology	35.7%	1.4%
Financial Services	11.6%	-
Communication Services	11.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.3%	45.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	12.9%
Utilities	2.4%	35.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.0%

Return for Risk

VOO vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 69
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VOO	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.05	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	1.59	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.19	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	1.92	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.97	4.79	+8.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VOO vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VOO	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	1.05	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	1.63	-0.76

Drawdowns

VOO vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum NUKZ drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOO	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-33.03%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-16.51%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-10.27%	+7.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-6.02%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	6.62%	-4.70%

Volatility

VOO vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOO	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	10.20%	-6.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	22.61%	-13.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	30.26%	-18.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	32.82%	-15.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	32.82%	-14.79%

VOO vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOO vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOO and NUKZ in my portfolio?

VOO and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOO or NUKZ?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, VOO or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 31.62% vs 24.91% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOO or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 31.62% return vs 24.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOO or NUKZ?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOO or NUKZ?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between VOO and NUKZ?

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.