VOO vs. IWY
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.35%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for IWY. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.
Performance
VOO vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 15.35%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.28% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
IWY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
VOO vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 4.27% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and IWY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VOO and IWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
IWY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
IWY
Financial Services
VOO
IWY
Communication Services
VOO
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
IWY
Healthcare
VOO
IWY
Industrials
VOO
IWY
Consumer Defensive
VOO
IWY
Energy
VOO
IWY
Utilities
VOO
IWY
Real Estate
VOO
IWY
Basic Materials
VOO
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
IWY
VOO vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOO | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.35 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 4.40 | +8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOO | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.42 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.92 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.91 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
VOO vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -32.68% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -16.63% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -23.22% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -32.68% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -32.68% | -1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -4.51% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -4.75% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 5.11% | -3.19% |
Volatility
VOO vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 4.80% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 12.12% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 15.86% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 21.52% | -4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 21.00% | -2.97% |
VOO vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than IWY's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VOO and IWY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWY has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.28% vs 15.35% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.28% return vs 15.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.34% for IWY.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.20% for IWY.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer