PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 15.35%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

IJR

1D
0.65%
1M
0.17%
YTD
15.49%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.49%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and IJR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.82

The correlation between VOO and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
IJR

Technology

35.7%
15.5%

Financial Services

11.6%
16.8%

Communication Services

11.3%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
13.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.1%

Industrials

8.3%
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.5%

Energy

3.5%
5.9%

Utilities

2.4%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
7.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
5.1%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
IJR
15.5%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
IJR
16.8%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
IJR
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
IJR
13.4%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
IJR
11.1%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
IJR
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
IJR
3.5%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
IJR
5.9%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
IJR
2.0%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
IJR
7.6%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
IJR
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.52

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

11.72

+1.25

VOO vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.74

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.25

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.47

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.43

+0.44

Drawdowns

VOO vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-58.15%

+24.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.68%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-28.02%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-28.02%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-44.36%

+10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-1.20%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-9.28%

+5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.61%

-0.69%

Volatility

VOO vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

4.73%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

11.82%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

17.63%

-5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

21.42%

-4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

22.92%

-4.89%

VOO vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than IJR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and IJR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJR has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.35% vs 10.61% for IJR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IJR.

IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.06% for IJR.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer