PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 15.35%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

HDV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.01%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.65%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
13.23%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and HDV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and HDV has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOO vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
HDV

Technology

35.7%
8.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.1%

Communication Services

11.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
6.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
16.5%

Industrials

8.3%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
24.1%

Energy

3.5%
22.3%

Utilities

2.4%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.2%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
HDV
8.2%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
HDV
11.1%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
HDV
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
HDV
6.1%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
HDV
16.5%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
HDV
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
HDV
24.1%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
HDV
22.3%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
HDV
9.2%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
HDV

-

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
HDV
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.10

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

11.37

+1.60

VOO vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOHDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.19

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.83

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.59

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.72

+0.15

Drawdowns

VOO vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-37.04%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-5.18%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-10.49%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-15.42%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-37.04%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-2.08%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-3.09%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.86%

+0.06%

Volatility

VOO vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.08%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.08%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

7.51%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

9.71%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

12.82%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

15.73%

+2.30%

VOO vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than HDV's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.89%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and HDV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to HDV (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.35% vs 9.21% for HDV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HDV.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while HDV is Dividend. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer