PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. BRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than BRLN's 1.14% return.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

BRLN

1D
0.35%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.72%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%2.93%
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
1.14%5.38%7.49%13.42%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and BRLN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BRLN
BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOBRLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.41

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

9.32

+3.65

VOO vs. BRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the BRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and BRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOBRLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.54

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

2.16

-1.28

Drawdowns

VOO vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and BRLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOBRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-3.85%

-30.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-2.00%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-3.85%

-14.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-0.42%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-0.31%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.52%

+1.40%

Volatility

VOO vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 1.11%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOBRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

1.11%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

2.34%

+6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

3.14%

+8.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

3.74%

+13.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

3.74%

+14.29%

VOO vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than BRLN's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
6.37%6.50%7.87%9.06%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and BRLN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to BRLN (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs BRLN's -3.85%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 21.45% vs 7.18% for BRLN. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 21.45% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.

BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while BRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.55% for BRLN.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and BRLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer