VOO vs. AAAU
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOO returned 13.49%/yr vs 17.79%/yr for AAAU. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.
Performance
VOO vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's 0.26% return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
AAAU
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 30.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -10.35% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.26% | 64.06% | 26.91% | 12.96% | -0.50% | -4.01% | 25.02% | 18.17% | 9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and AAAU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018 | 0.08 |
The correlation between VOO and AAAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOO vs. AAAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
AAAU
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VOO
AAAU
-
Financial Services
VOO
AAAU
-
Communication Services
VOO
AAAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
AAAU
-
Healthcare
VOO
AAAU
-
Industrials
VOO
AAAU
-
Consumer Defensive
VOO
AAAU
-
Energy
VOO
AAAU
-
Utilities
VOO
AAAU
-
Real Estate
VOO
AAAU
Basic Materials
VOO
AAAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
AAAU
VOO vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOO | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.53 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 3.83 | +9.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOO | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.15 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.00 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.06 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
VOO vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and AAAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -21.63% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -20.00% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -20.00% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -20.94% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -19.83% | +17.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -6.20% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 7.96% | -6.04% |
Volatility
VOO vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 5.65% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 23.25% | -13.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 26.60% | -14.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 17.91% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.03% | +1.00% |
VOO vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and AAAU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAAU has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs AAAU's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, AAAU leads with 17.79% vs 13.49% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 17.79% return vs 13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for AAAU.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while AAAU is Gold. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while AAAU tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.18% for AAAU.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and AAAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer