VONG vs. AVGO
VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VONG returned 18.32%/yr vs 41.32%/yr for AVGO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VONG vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 14.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 18.32%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 41.32% annualized return.
VONG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
AVGO
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 61.91%
- 3Y*
- 72.46%
- 5Y*
- 56.70%
- 10Y*
- 41.32%
VONG vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 4.12% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 14.83% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and AVGO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.65 |
The correlation between VONG and AVGO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONG vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank
VONG
AVGO
VONG vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONG | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.17 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 5.16 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONG | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.32 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 1.05 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.09 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
VONG vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum AVGO drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and AVGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONG | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -48.30% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -28.67% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -41.15% | +17.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -41.15% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -48.30% | +15.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.47% | -17.64% | +13.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -7.97% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 12.03% | -7.18% |
Volatility
VONG vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is 4.78%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 20.09%. This indicates that VONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONG | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 20.09% | -15.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 34.69% | -22.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 45.31% | -29.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 43.31% | -21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 39.48% | -18.58% |
Dividends
VONG vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than AVGO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.63% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONG and AVGO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to VONG (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs AVGO's -48.30%.
AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONG and AVGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer