PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQI vs. LQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQI vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly lower than LQD's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQI has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of 2.19%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.41% annualized return.


VNQI

1D
0.18%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
2.19%

LQD

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQI vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-3.93%21.38%-2.22%6.99%-22.94%5.93%-7.22%21.59%-9.44%26.91%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.06%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQI and LQD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010

0.19

Over the past year, VNQI and LQD have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQI vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQI vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQILQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.19

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

1.72

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.66

4.88

-4.23

VNQI vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQI and LQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQILQDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.08

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

-0.03

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.28

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.54

-0.34

Drawdowns

VNQI vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and LQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQILQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-24.95%

-13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-3.34%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-8.43%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-24.95%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.35%

-24.95%

-13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.24%

-4.21%

-9.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-3.99%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

1.18%

+3.81%

Volatility

VNQI vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 1.62%. This indicates that VNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQILQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

1.62%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

3.94%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

5.32%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

8.65%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

8.68%

+7.39%

VNQI vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQI vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than LQD's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.59%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.90%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQI and LQD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQI has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to LQD (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs LQD's -24.95%.

On 10-year performance, LQD leads with 2.41% vs 2.19% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LQD has performed better with a 2.41% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LQD.

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 4.59% for LQD.

VNQI is categorized as REIT, while LQD is Corporate Bonds. VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.15% for LQD.

LQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQI and LQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer