PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQ vs. VCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQ vs. VCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than VCR's -1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed VCR with an annualized return of 5.30%, while VCR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.


VNQ

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.17%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
5.30%

VCR

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
-1.82%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
9.04%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.82%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and VCR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between VNQ and VCR has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQ vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQVCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.65

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

2.01

+1.95

VNQ vs. VCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the VCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and VCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQVCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.24

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.60

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.51

-0.24

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than VCR's maximum drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and VCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQVCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-61.54%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-15.59%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-27.36%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-39.20%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

-39.20%

-3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-6.29%

+3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-9.40%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.01%

-2.36%

Volatility

VNQ vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.13%, while Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQVCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

5.30%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

13.20%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

18.44%

-5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

24.00%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

22.42%

-1.71%

VNQ vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQ vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than VCR's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.74%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.65%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQ and VCR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCR has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to VNQ (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs VCR's -61.54%.

On 10-year performance, VCR leads with 13.45% vs 5.30% for VNQ. On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCR has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.74% for VCR.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while VCR is Consumer Discretionary Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.10% for VCR.

VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and VCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer