PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQ vs. VAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQ vs. VAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VNQ having a 9.04% return and VAW slightly higher at 9.07%. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 5.30%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.


VNQ

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.17%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
5.30%

VAW

1D
-1.01%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
9.07%
6M
14.24%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
9.04%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
9.07%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and VAW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.58

The correlation between VNQ and VAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNQ vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQ
VAW

Real Estate

97.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
90.2%

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Technology

0.3%
0.1%

Energy

0.1%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Industrials

0.0%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

VNQ
97.3%
VAW

-

Basic Materials

VNQ
1.1%
VAW
90.2%

Communication Services

VNQ
0.6%
VAW

-

Technology

VNQ
0.3%
VAW
0.1%

Energy

VNQ
0.1%
VAW
0.5%

Financial Services

VNQ
0.1%
VAW

-

Industrials

VNQ
0.0%
VAW
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VNQ

-

VAW
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VNQ

-

VAW
0.0%

Healthcare

VNQ

-

VAW
0.5%

Utilities

VNQ

-

VAW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQ vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQVAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

4.32

-0.37

VNQ vs. VAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the VAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and VAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQVAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.01

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.27

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.47

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.39

-0.12

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than VAW's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and VAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQVAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-62.17%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-13.42%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-23.21%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-25.50%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

-41.13%

-1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-7.27%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-9.63%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.14%

-1.49%

Volatility

VNQ vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.13%, while Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQVAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

5.94%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

14.18%

-4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

17.88%

-4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

19.65%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

21.22%

-0.51%

VNQ vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQ vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than VAW's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.41%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.65%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQ and VAW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to VNQ (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs VAW's -62.17%.

On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 9.87% vs 5.30% for VNQ. On fees, VAW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VAW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.41% for VAW.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while VAW is Materials. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.10% for VAW.

VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and VAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer