VNQ vs. TMRAF
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) is REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while TMRAF (Tomra Systems ASA) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.30%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for TMRAF. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VNQ vs. TMRAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than TMRAF's -25.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed TMRAF with an annualized return of 5.30%, while TMRAF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.30%
TMRAF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- -25.51%
- 6M
- -19.86%
- 1Y
- -34.94%
- 3Y*
- -12.47%
- 5Y*
- -9.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
VNQ vs. TMRAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 9.04% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | -25.51% | 7.13% | 13.87% | -32.05% | -27.02% | 50.97% | 51.54% | 46.27% | 48.12% | 82.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and TMRAF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2007 | 0.05 |
The correlation between VNQ and TMRAF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. TMRAF — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
TMRAF
VNQ vs. TMRAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNQ | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.86 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | -0.74 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | -1.38 | +5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNQ | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | -0.66 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | -0.16 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.28 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. TMRAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, roughly equal to the maximum TMRAF drawdown of -71.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and TMRAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -71.64% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -47.39% | +39.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -56.94% | +39.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -71.64% | +37.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -71.64% | +29.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -59.61% | +56.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -20.64% | +7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 25.28% | -22.63% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. TMRAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.13%, while Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a volatility of 19.65%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 19.65% | -15.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 40.54% | -31.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 53.41% | -40.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 58.64% | -39.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 49.89% | -29.18% |
Dividends
VNQ vs. TMRAF - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than TMRAF's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | 0.23% | 1.55% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 1.62% | 4.28% | 13.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.65% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and TMRAF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMRAF has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to VNQ (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs TMRAF's -71.64%.
VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and TMRAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer