PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNM vs. VVMX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VNM is traded in USD, while VVMX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VVMX.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly lower than VVMX.DE's 28.72% return.


VNM

1D
-1.28%
1M
-10.17%
YTD
-6.92%
6M
-4.93%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
3.11%

VVMX.DE

1D
-1.72%
1M
-8.54%
YTD
28.72%
6M
34.61%
1Y
152.29%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
-6.92%66.55%-11.15%15.01%-43.74%11.93%
VVMX.DE
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
28.72%90.17%-34.77%-18.68%-30.51%14.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VNM and VVMX.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.18

The correlation between VNM and VVMX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNM vs. VVMX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNM
VNM Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

VVMX.DE
VVMX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNMVVMX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.44

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

7.50

-5.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

19.56

-15.01

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNM and VVMX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNMVVMX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

3.43

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.02

-0.04

Drawdowns

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, smaller than the maximum VVMX.DE drawdown of -73.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and VVMX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNMVVMX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-73.32%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-21.21%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.60%

-62.07%

+30.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.51%

-21.15%

-6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.83%

-41.55%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

8.15%

-1.41%

Volatility

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) is 4.90%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that VNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVMX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNMVVMX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

12.99%

-8.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

32.83%

-14.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.89%

46.42%

-19.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.27%

37.93%

-13.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.47%

37.93%

-14.46%

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VVMX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNM vs. VVMX.DE - Dividend Comparison

VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while VVMX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
0.21%0.20%0.00%5.21%0.96%0.49%0.40%0.76%0.83%1.14%2.44%3.69%
VVMX.DE
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNM and VVMX.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VVMX.DE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VVMX.DE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.

VNM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VVMX.DE is Commodity Producers Equities. VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index, while VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for VNM and 0.59% for VVMX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNM and VVMX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer