PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMBS vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMBS vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VMBS has underperformed BIV with an annualized return of 1.31%, while BIV has yielded a comparatively higher 1.83% annualized return.


VMBS

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.91%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.31%

BIV

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMBS vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.27%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%0.91%2.47%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.67%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VMBS and BIV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.78

The correlation between VMBS and BIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMBS vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMBS vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMBSBIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.49

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

4.40

+4.00

VMBS vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMBS and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMBSBIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.18

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.01

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.33

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.64

-0.19

Drawdowns

VMBS vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMBSBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-18.95%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-3.18%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.65%

-6.07%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-18.74%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.47%

-18.95%

+1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-2.46%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-3.39%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.07%

-0.26%

Volatility

VMBS vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.35%. This indicates that VMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMBSBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

1.35%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

2.93%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

4.00%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

6.40%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

5.51%

-0.11%

VMBS vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMBS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMBS vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, which matches BIV's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.24%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.20%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VMBS and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMBS has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to BIV (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs BIV's -18.95%.

On 10-year performance, BIV leads with 1.83% vs 1.31% for VMBS. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BIV has performed better with a 1.83% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VMBS.

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 4.20% for VMBS.

VMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. VMBS tracks Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VMBS and 0.03% for BIV.

VMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMBS and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer