VLUE vs. CMDY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VLUE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Weighted Index, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VLUE returned 15.73%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for CMDY. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VLUE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.

Performance

VLUE vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 43.65% return, which is significantly higher than CMDY's 21.76% return.

VLUE

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: 7.11%
• YTD: 43.65%
• 6M: 46.05%
• 1Y: 83.03%
• 3Y*: 31.74%
• 5Y*: 15.73%
• 10Y*: 15.02%

CMDY

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: 21.76%
• 6M: 21.83%
• 1Y: 31.65%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLUE vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	43.65%	32.67%	7.25%	14.26%	-14.17%	28.93%	-0.23%	27.20%	-10.75%
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF	21.76%	15.81%	5.43%	-9.33%	14.55%	26.38%	1.15%	4.96%	-11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VLUE and CMDY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018	0.27

The correlation between VLUE and CMDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VLUE vs. CMDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VLUE	CMDY
Technology	44.5%	-
Financial Services	10.4%	-
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Communication Services	8.3%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	-
Industrials	7.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	-
Energy	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.0%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

VLUE vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLUE

VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 97
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 96
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CMDY

CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 69
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLUE vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VLUE	CMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.65	1.96	+2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.85	2.51	+3.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	1.35	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.24	4.11	+5.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	40.39	11.95	+28.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VLUE vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLUE Sharpe Ratio is 4.65, which is higher than the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLUE and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VLUE	CMDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.65	1.96	+2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.63	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.53	+0.21

Drawdowns

VLUE vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and CMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLUE	CMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.47%	-31.19%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	-7.73%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-10.08%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.12%	-26.56%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.99%	-6.78%	+2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-13.13%	+7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.66%	-0.60%

Volatility

VLUE vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) at 5.12%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLUE	CMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.02%	5.12%	+3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.83%	14.45%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.97%	16.28%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	15.83%	+2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.88%	14.65%	+5.23%

VLUE vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

VLUE vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than CMDY's 10.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF	10.59%	12.89%	4.23%	5.10%	3.98%	16.09%	0.15%	2.21%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	1.45%	2.11%	2.73%	2.66%	3.18%	2.22%	2.42%	2.61%	2.70%	2.14%	2.07%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLUE and CMDY in my portfolio?

VLUE and CMDY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLUE or CMDY?

VLUE has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to CMDY (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

Which ETF is better, VLUE or CMDY?

On 5-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.73% vs 9.88% for CMDY. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CMDY has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VLUE or CMDY?

Over the 5-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VLUE or CMDY?

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VLUE or CMDY?

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.59%, compared with 1.45% for VLUE.

What is the main difference between VLUE and CMDY?

VLUE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CMDY is Commodities. VLUE tracks MSCI USA Value Weighted Index, while CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.28% for CMDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.65 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.