PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIS vs. VCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIS vs. VCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than VCR's -1.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIS having a 13.91% annualized return and VCR not far behind at 13.45%.


VIS

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.03%
YTD
13.89%
6M
14.16%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
13.91%

VCR

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
-1.82%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIS vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
13.89%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.82%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VIS and VCR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.79

The correlation between VIS and VCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIS vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIS vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VISVCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.10

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.65

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

2.01

+6.39

VIS vs. VCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the VCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIS and VCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VISVCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.55

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.24

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.60

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.51

+0.01

Drawdowns

VIS vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, roughly equal to the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and VCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VISVCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-61.54%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-15.59%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-27.36%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.96%

-39.20%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-39.20%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-6.29%

+4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-9.40%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

5.01%

-2.05%

Volatility

VIS vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) is 4.56%, while Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that VIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VISVCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.30%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

13.20%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

18.44%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

24.00%

-5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

22.42%

-1.98%

VIS vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIS vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison

VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than VCR's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.74%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.90%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIS and VCR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCR has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to VIS (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs VCR's -61.54%.

On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 13.91% vs 13.45% for VCR. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VIS has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VCR.

VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.74% for VCR.

VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VCR is Consumer Discretionary Equities. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VIS and 0.10% for VCR.

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIS and VCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer