VIS vs. SPMO
VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 13.91%/yr vs 20.38%/yr for SPMO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
VIS vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 24.29% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 13.91%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.38% annualized return.
VIS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
VIS vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 13.89% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 24.29% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and SPMO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VIS and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIS vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIS
SPMO
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
VIS
SPMO
Technology
VIS
SPMO
Utilities
VIS
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
VIS
SPMO
Financial Services
VIS
SPMO
Energy
VIS
SPMO
Basic Materials
VIS
SPMO
Communication Services
VIS
SPMO
Real Estate
VIS
SPMO
Healthcare
VIS
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
VIS
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIS vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
VIS
SPMO
VIS vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.13 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 12.02 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.13 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.19 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 1.00 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.98 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
VIS vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -30.95% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -12.70% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.80% | -20.13% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | -22.74% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -30.95% | -11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -4.65% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -4.60% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.30% | -0.34% |
Volatility
VIS vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) is 4.56%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that VIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 9.44% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.57% | 15.82% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 18.72% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 19.50% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 20.41% | +0.03% |
VIS vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIS vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than SPMO's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIS and SPMO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to VIS (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.38% vs 13.91% for VIS. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VIS has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.38% return vs 13.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.
VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VIS and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIS and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer