PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYL.AS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYL.AS is traded in EUR, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYL.AS achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VHYL.AS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.71%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


VHYL.AS

1D
0.10%
1M
3.02%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.93%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
9.71%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
2.29%
YTD
10.58%
6M
9.60%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHYL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing
12.30%12.40%16.77%7.03%0.17%27.85%-8.79%22.91%-7.00%4.82%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.73%3.84%33.23%22.54%-13.10%38.43%8.57%34.33%-0.02%6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYL.AS and VOO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013

0.56

The correlation between VHYL.AS and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYL.AS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYL.AS
VHYL.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHYL.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYL.ASVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.35

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

3.17

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.33

11.93

+3.40

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYL.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYL.AS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYL.ASVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.90

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.88

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.81

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.89

-0.46

Drawdowns

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYL.AS drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYL.AS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYL.ASVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-33.49%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-7.37%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.76%

-23.87%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

-23.87%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-33.49%

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.98%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-4.03%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.95%

-0.43%

Volatility

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) is 2.12%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that VHYL.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYL.ASVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

2.89%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

8.76%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

12.27%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.56%

16.72%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.59%

18.54%

-4.95%

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYL.AS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYL.AS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VHYL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHYL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing
2.50%2.85%3.04%3.41%3.78%3.03%3.08%3.24%3.68%3.13%3.02%3.25%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYL.AS and VOO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYL.AS.

VHYL.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. VHYL.AS tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYL.AS and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYL.AS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer