PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVG.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 9.33% return.


VHVG.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.63%
YTD
10.41%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*

CSP1.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.90%
YTD
9.33%
6M
8.95%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
10.41%13.84%20.00%17.53%-8.16%22.64%12.56%-17.91%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.33%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVG.L and CSP1.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.97

The correlation between VHVG.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHVG.L
CSP1.L

Technology

29.0%
38.4%

Financial Services

15.6%
11.0%

Industrials

11.5%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.0%

Communication Services

9.0%
10.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.6%

Energy

4.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.7%

Utilities

2.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.8%

Technology

VHVG.L
29.0%
CSP1.L
38.4%

Financial Services

VHVG.L
15.6%
CSP1.L
11.0%

Industrials

VHVG.L
11.5%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VHVG.L
9.3%
CSP1.L
10.0%

Communication Services

VHVG.L
9.0%
CSP1.L
10.8%

Healthcare

VHVG.L
8.5%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

VHVG.L
5.1%
CSP1.L
4.6%

Energy

VHVG.L
4.1%
CSP1.L
3.2%

Basic Materials

VHVG.L
3.4%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Utilities

VHVG.L
2.6%
CSP1.L
2.1%

Real Estate

VHVG.L
2.0%
CSP1.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVG.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.79

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.21

13.92

+2.29

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVG.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVG.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.53

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.03

+0.43

Drawdowns

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVG.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-25.48%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-7.12%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-20.77%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.95%

-20.77%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.34%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-3.65%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.94%

-0.25%

Volatility

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVG.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.72%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

7.17%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

10.68%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

20.00%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

18.44%

+2.14%

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHVG.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VHVG.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VHVG.L and CSP1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVG.L.

VHVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVG.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVG.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer