PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHT vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHT vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 9.66%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.


VHT

1D
-0.29%
1M
5.33%
YTD
-1.21%
6M
0.70%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
9.66%

VDC

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
7.19%
6M
7.44%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-1.21%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
7.19%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and VDC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and VDC has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHT vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHT
VDC

Healthcare

100.0%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%
0.3%

Technology

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

97.5%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

VHT
100.0%
VDC
0.0%

Financial Services

VHT
0.0%
VDC

-

Industrials

VHT
0.0%
VDC
0.3%

Technology

VHT
0.0%
VDC

-

Basic Materials

VHT

-

VDC
0.3%

Communication Services

VHT

-

VDC

-

Consumer Cyclical

VHT

-

VDC
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VHT

-

VDC
97.5%

Energy

VHT

-

VDC

-

Real Estate

VHT

-

VDC

-

Utilities

VHT

-

VDC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHT vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHTVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.06

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

0.44

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

0.90

+3.05

VHT vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHTVDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.33

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.51

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.52

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.67

-0.10

Drawdowns

VHT vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHTVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-34.24%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-9.28%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-11.78%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-16.55%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-25.31%

-3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-7.27%

+2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-3.73%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

4.53%

-0.36%

Volatility

VHT vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.47%. This indicates that VHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHTVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.47%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

9.87%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

12.43%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

13.15%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

14.65%

+2.32%

VHT vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VHT and VDC have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHT vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than VDC's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.14%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.66%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHT and VDC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHT has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to VDC (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs VDC's -34.24%.

On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.66% vs 7.63% for VDC. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VHT and VDC have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.66% for VHT.

VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index.

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHT and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer