VHT vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.66%/yr vs 18.53%/yr for SCHG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

VHT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.66%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.53% annualized return.

VHT

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: -1.21%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 7.21%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 14.90%
• 10Y*: 18.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	-1.21%	15.46%	2.66%	2.52%	-5.60%	20.57%	18.29%	21.87%	5.58%	23.26%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	3.75%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and SCHG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and SCHG has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHT vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VHT	SCHG
Healthcare	100.0%	7.7%
Financial Services	0.0%	6.7%
Industrials	0.0%	5.8%
Technology	0.0%	46.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.4%
Communication Services	-	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.7%
Energy	-	0.8%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

VHT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT

VHT Risk / Return Rank: 34
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VHT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.33	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.82	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.24	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.27	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.95	4.25	-0.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VHT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VHT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	1.33	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.67	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.86	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.83	-0.27

Drawdowns

VHT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VHT	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.12%	-34.59%	-4.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-16.41%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.91%	-23.39%	+6.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.71%	-34.59%	+16.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.85%	-34.59%	+5.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	-4.25%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-5.20%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	4.91%	-0.74%

Volatility

VHT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.52%. This indicates that VHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VHT	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	4.52%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.45%	12.02%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	15.77%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	22.31%	-7.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	21.58%	-4.61%

VHT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VHT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	1.66%	1.61%	1.53%	1.36%	1.33%	1.14%	1.21%	1.89%	1.38%	1.31%	1.45%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VHT and SCHG in my portfolio?

VHT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VHT or SCHG?

VHT has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, VHT or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.53% vs 9.66% for VHT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VHT or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VHT or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VHT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VHT or SCHG?

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between VHT and SCHG?

VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.