VHT vs. IAU
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.66%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for IAU. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
VHT vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 9.66%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
IAU
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
VHT vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -1.21% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.26% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and IAU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005 | 0.04 |
The correlation between VHT and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VHT vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
IAU
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
VHT
IAU
-
Financial Services
VHT
IAU
-
Industrials
VHT
IAU
-
Technology
VHT
IAU
-
Basic Materials
VHT
-
IAU
-
Communication Services
VHT
-
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
IAU
-
Energy
VHT
-
IAU
-
Real Estate
VHT
-
IAU
Utilities
VHT
-
IAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
IAU
VHT vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.52 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | 3.80 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.99 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.80 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
VHT vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -45.14% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -20.04% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -20.04% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -20.93% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -21.82% | -7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -19.88% | +15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -15.97% | +9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 7.99% | -3.82% |
Volatility
VHT vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.90%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 5.64% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 23.33% | -12.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 26.68% | -12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 18.02% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 15.94% | +1.03% |
VHT vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VHT vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.66% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and IAU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to VHT (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 12.71% vs 9.66% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IAU is Gold. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.25% for IAU.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer