PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 25.14%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.02% annualized return.


VGT

1D
1.71%
1M
4.28%
YTD
24.57%
6M
21.33%
1Y
50.38%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
20.82%
10Y*
25.14%

XLE

1D
1.14%
1M
4.72%
YTD
31.32%
6M
30.37%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.57%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
31.32%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and XLE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.42

The correlation between VGT and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGT vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
XLE

Technology

98.5%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

0.4%

-

Energy

0.3%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

VGT
98.5%
XLE

-

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
XLE

-

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
XLE

-

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
XLE

-

Energy

VGT
0.3%
XLE
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
XLE

-

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

VGT

-

XLE

-

Utilities

VGT

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.70

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

10.59

-0.82

VGT vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.18

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.79

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.34

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.31

+0.36

Drawdowns

VGT vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-71.26%

+16.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-12.05%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-20.14%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-26.04%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-66.81%

+31.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-6.76%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-17.98%

+10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

4.20%

+0.97%

Volatility

VGT vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.07%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

7.07%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

16.58%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

20.48%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

26.03%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

29.58%

-4.89%

VGT vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than XLE's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.56%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and XLE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to XLE (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.14% vs 10.02% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.08% for XLE.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer