PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. DIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. DIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly higher than DIV's 12.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 25.14%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.


VGT

1D
1.71%
1M
4.28%
YTD
24.57%
6M
21.33%
1Y
50.38%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
20.82%
10Y*
25.14%

DIV

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
12.28%
6M
11.92%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.57%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
12.28%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and DIV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between VGT and DIV has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VGT vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
DIV

Technology

98.5%

-

Communication Services

0.5%
6.3%

Financial Services

0.5%
3.9%

Industrials

0.4%
11.5%

Energy

0.3%
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
4.6%

Healthcare

0.0%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

13.4%

Real Estate

-

19.8%

Utilities

-

12.0%

Technology

VGT
98.5%
DIV

-

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
DIV
6.3%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
DIV
3.9%

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
DIV
11.5%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
DIV
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
DIV
3.5%

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
DIV
4.6%

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
DIV
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

DIV
13.4%

Real Estate

VGT

-

DIV
19.8%

Utilities

VGT

-

DIV
12.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.97

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

8.27

+1.50

VGT vs. DIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the DIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and DIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.50

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.37

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.22

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.28

+0.39

Drawdowns

VGT vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, roughly equal to the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and DIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-52.74%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-5.23%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-12.33%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-21.14%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-52.74%

+17.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-2.63%

-4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-7.02%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

1.87%

+3.30%

Volatility

VGT vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.19%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

3.19%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

7.05%

+10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

10.33%

+11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

13.68%

+11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

17.99%

+6.70%

VGT vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGT vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than DIV's 6.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.74%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and DIV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to DIV (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs DIV's -52.74%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.14% vs 4.02% for DIV. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.74%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.45% for DIV.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and DIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer