VFH vs. VWO
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VFH returned 12.59%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for VWO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
VFH vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 12.59%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
VFH
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
VFH vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -4.26% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and VWO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VFH and VWO has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VFH vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFH
VWO
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFH
VWO
Technology
VFH
VWO
Real Estate
VFH
VWO
Industrials
VFH
VWO
Healthcare
VFH
VWO
Communication Services
VFH
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
VFH
VWO
Basic Materials
VFH
-
VWO
Consumer Defensive
VFH
-
VWO
Energy
VFH
-
VWO
Utilities
VFH
-
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
VWO
VFH vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFH | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 2.18 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 7.79 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFH | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 1.49 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.45 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.26 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
VFH vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VWO's maximum drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -67.68% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -11.17% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -17.37% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -32.60% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | -36.39% | -8.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -4.67% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -15.81% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 3.12% | +2.48% |
Volatility
VFH vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.28%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 6.29% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 13.80% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 16.37% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 17.45% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 19.23% | +3.33% |
VFH vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFH vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFH and VWO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VFH (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFH.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.53% for VFH.
VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.08% for VWO.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFH and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer