VFEG.L vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VFEG.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - VFEG.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFEG.L returned 5.67%/yr vs 20.37%/yr for SLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFEG.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.

Performance

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VFEG.L is traded in GBP, while SLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLV values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFEG.L achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -3.48% return.

VFEG.L

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 26.30%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: —

SLV

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -13.83%
• YTD: -3.48%
• 6M: 16.63%
• 1Y: 90.96%
• 3Y*: 37.61%
• 5Y*: 20.37%
• 10Y*: 14.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VFEG.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc	9.05%	17.15%	14.12%	1.28%	-7.26%	-0.01%	11.28%	-15.84%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-3.48%	127.23%	23.00%	-6.03%	14.54%	-11.63%	42.98%	-10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEG.L and SLV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019	0.21

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VFEG.L	SLV
Technology	29.6%	-
Financial Services	20.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	-
Basic Materials	7.8%	100.0%
Communication Services	7.5%	-
Industrials	7.1%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

VFEG.L vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFEG.L

VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 61
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 43
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFEG.L	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.59	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.87	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	2.26	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.49	4.78	+4.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEG.L and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFEG.L	SLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.59	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.60	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.36	-0.19

Drawdowns

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -69.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEG.L and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFEG.L	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.33%	-69.62%	+35.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-40.40%	+31.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.33%	-40.40%	+18.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.33%	-40.40%	+18.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.77%	-39.66%	+35.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.89%	-38.02%	+26.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	19.09%	-16.32%

Volatility

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) is 5.25%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.84%. This indicates that VFEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFEG.L	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	15.84%	-10.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	56.83%	-45.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	57.77%	-43.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.27%	34.11%	-13.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.20%	30.55%	-8.35%

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFEG.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

VFEG.L vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither VFEG.L nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFEG.L and SLV in my portfolio?

VFEG.L and SLV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VFEG.L or SLV?

On fees, VFEG.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFEG.L or SLV?

VFEG.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

What is the main difference between VFEG.L and SLV?

VFEG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SLV is Silver. VFEG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VFEG.L and 0.50% for SLV.