VFEG.L vs. IGF
VFEG.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFEG.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFEG.L returned 5.67%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for IGF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFEG.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VFEG.L is traded in GBP, while IGF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGF values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFEG.L achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.12% return.
VFEG.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFEG.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 9.05% | 17.15% | 14.12% | 1.28% | -7.26% | -0.01% | 11.28% | -15.84% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.12% | 12.66% | 16.82% | 0.84% | 10.49% | 12.63% | -9.24% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFEG.L and IGF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019 | 0.31 |
The correlation between VFEG.L and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFEG.L
IGF
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VFEG.L
IGF
-
Financial Services
VFEG.L
IGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
VFEG.L
IGF
-
Basic Materials
VFEG.L
IGF
-
Communication Services
VFEG.L
IGF
-
Industrials
VFEG.L
IGF
Energy
VFEG.L
IGF
Consumer Defensive
VFEG.L
IGF
-
Healthcare
VFEG.L
IGF
-
Utilities
VFEG.L
IGF
Real Estate
VFEG.L
IGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFEG.L vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
VFEG.L
IGF
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFEG.L | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 3.05 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 7.95 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFEG.L | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.62 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.91 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.39 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFEG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -40.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEG.L and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFEG.L | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -40.37% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -5.10% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.33% | -11.18% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | -17.01% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.77% | -4.33% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -7.58% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.96% | +0.81% |
Volatility
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.40%. This indicates that VFEG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFEG.L | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 3.40% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 7.71% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 9.61% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 12.11% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 15.99% | +6.21% |
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFEG.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFEG.L vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
VFEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.01% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
VFEG.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFEG.L and IGF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFEG.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFEG.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
VFEG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. VFEG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VFEG.L and 0.39% for IGF.
Find the right allocation for VFEG.L and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer