PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VFEG.L is traded in GBP, while EQQQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFEG.L achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.DE's 16.98% return.


VFEG.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
9.05%
6M
9.31%
1Y
26.30%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*

EQQQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.69%
YTD
16.98%
6M
15.11%
1Y
37.92%
3Y*
24.58%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
22.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
9.05%17.15%14.12%1.28%-7.26%-0.01%11.28%-15.84%
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
16.98%12.50%27.84%48.30%-26.28%29.60%42.17%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEG.L and EQQQ.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.53

The correlation between VFEG.L and EQQQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFEG.L
VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.DE
EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFEG.LEQQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.40

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

9.86

-0.38

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEG.L and EQQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFEG.LEQQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.46

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.92

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.18

-0.01

Drawdowns

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown of -55.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEG.L and EQQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFEG.LEQQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.33%

-55.99%

+21.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-11.07%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.33%

-25.07%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-27.67%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-2.88%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-11.60%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.82%

-1.05%

Volatility

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) at 4.91%. This indicates that VFEG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFEG.LEQQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

4.91%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

10.73%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

15.28%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

19.43%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

20.31%

+1.89%

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFEG.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFEG.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

VFEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.37%0.39%0.57%0.25%0.41%0.54%0.64%0.68%0.78%0.73%
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFEG.L and EQQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFEG.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFEG.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

VFEG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EQQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. VFEG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while EQQQ.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VFEG.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFEG.L and EQQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer