PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEU vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEU vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEU achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEU having a 9.86% annualized return and XLV not far behind at 9.65%.


VEU

1D
0.90%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.84%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
9.86%

XLV

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.38%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.65%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEU vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
11.45%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.98%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VEU and XLV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2007

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between VEU and XLV has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VEU vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEU
XLV

Financial Services

23.3%

-

Technology

18.5%

-

Industrials

15.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%

-

Healthcare

7.1%
100.0%

Energy

5.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Communication Services

4.6%

-

Utilities

3.2%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Financial Services

VEU
23.3%
XLV

-

Technology

VEU
18.5%
XLV

-

Industrials

VEU
15.7%
XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

VEU
8.2%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

VEU
7.1%
XLV

-

Healthcare

VEU
7.1%
XLV
100.0%

Energy

VEU
5.2%
XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

VEU
5.1%
XLV

-

Communication Services

VEU
4.6%
XLV

-

Utilities

VEU
3.2%
XLV

-

Real Estate

VEU
2.0%
XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEU vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEU vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEUXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.50

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

3.60

+5.68

VEU vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEU and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEUXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.05

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.41

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.46

-0.22

Drawdowns

VEU vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEUXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.52%

-39.17%

-22.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-10.47%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-17.11%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-17.11%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-28.40%

-6.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-4.32%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-7.12%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

4.35%

-1.39%

Volatility

VEU vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.02%. This indicates that VEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEUXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

5.02%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

10.66%

+2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

14.99%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

14.76%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

16.58%

+0.67%

VEU vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEU has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEU vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than XLV's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.68%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.64%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEU and XLV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEU has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to XLV (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEU dropped -61.52% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 10-year performance, VEU leads with 9.86% vs 9.65% for XLV. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEU has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLV.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.

VEU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VEU and 0.08% for XLV.

VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEU and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer