PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEMT.L is traded in GBP, while 4GLD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4GLD.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMT.L achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 1.94% return.


VEMT.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.47%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*

4GLD.DE

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
1.94%
6M
5.60%
1Y
35.03%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
20.01%
10Y*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.51%4.08%8.08%3.45%-5.21%-0.56%2.53%9.68%2.79%-1.60%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
1.94%57.09%28.71%7.13%12.98%-3.31%19.44%14.94%4.66%2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMT.L and 4GLD.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between VEMT.L and 4GLD.DE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMT.L4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.94

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

5.13

+1.56

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMT.L and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMT.L4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.45

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.22

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.65

-0.35

Drawdowns

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMT.L drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, smaller than the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -40.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMT.L and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMT.L4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-40.90%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.33%

-17.27%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

-17.27%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.41%

-17.27%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-15.64%

+15.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-12.90%

+7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

6.56%

-5.02%

Volatility

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) is 1.33%, while Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that VEMT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMT.L4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

5.09%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

19.99%

-15.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

23.11%

-17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

16.20%

-8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.14%

15.78%

-6.64%

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEMT.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

VEMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, while 4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.92%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.45%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMT.L and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEMT.L.

VEMT.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. VEMT.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEMT.L and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMT.L and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer