PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 7.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 10.14%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.21% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

XLP

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
7.54%
6M
8.22%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
7.54%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and XLP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between VEA and XLP has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VEA vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
XLP

Financial Services

23.3%

-

Industrials

19.2%

-

Technology

13.8%

-

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
99.0%

Energy

5.4%

-

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
XLP

-

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
XLP

-

Technology

VEA
13.8%
XLP

-

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
XLP
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
XLP
99.0%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
XLP

-

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
XLP

-

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
XLP

-

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEAXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.07

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.47

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

0.91

+8.48

VEA vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEAXLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

0.36

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.46

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.49

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.44

-0.20

Drawdowns

VEA vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-35.90%

-24.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-9.69%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-12.39%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-16.30%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-24.51%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-7.19%

+3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-7.06%

-6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

4.97%

-1.97%

Volatility

VEA vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.30%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

4.30%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

9.97%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

12.75%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

13.31%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

14.74%

+2.66%

VEA vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than XLP's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.62%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and XLP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to XLP (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.14% vs 7.21% for XLP. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.62% for XLP.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.08% for XLP.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer