VEA vs. XLF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.14%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for XLF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.

Performance

VEA vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 10.14%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.

VEA

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 6M: 14.95%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: 18.65%
• 5Y*: 9.09%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

XLF

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: -4.62%
• 6M: -1.98%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 12.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	12.02%	35.16%	3.15%	17.93%	-15.34%	11.66%	9.71%	22.62%	-14.75%	26.42%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	-4.62%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and XLF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between VEA and XLF has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VEA vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VEA	XLF
Financial Services	23.3%	98.0%
Industrials	19.2%	0.2%
Technology	13.8%	1.8%
Healthcare	8.2%	-
Basic Materials	7.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	-
Energy	5.4%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Utilities	3.3%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-

Return for Risk

VEA vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 56
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 58

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 12
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 12
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VEA	XLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	0.20	+1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	0.37	+2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.05	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	0.20	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.39	0.51	+8.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VEA vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VEA	XLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	0.20	+1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.46	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.58	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.21	+0.03

Drawdowns

VEA vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and XLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEA	XLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.68%	-82.69%	+22.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-14.79%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	-15.54%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	-25.81%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.73%	-42.86%	+7.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-7.38%	+3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.29%	-20.02%	+6.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	5.71%	-2.71%

Volatility

VEA vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.20%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEA	XLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	4.20%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.91%	11.18%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.15%	14.61%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	18.66%	-2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.40%	22.18%	-4.78%

VEA vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VEA vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than XLF's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.69%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.52%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEA and XLF in my portfolio?

VEA and XLF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VEA or XLF?

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to XLF (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs XLF's -82.69%.

Which ETF is better, VEA or XLF?

On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 12.79% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VEA or XLF?

Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VEA or XLF?

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VEA or XLF?

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.52% for XLF.

What is the main difference between VEA and XLF?

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.08% for XLF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.