VEA vs. TBLL
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VEA returned 9.09%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for TBLL. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for TBLL.
Performance
VEA vs. TBLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than TBLL's 1.48% return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- —
VEA vs. TBLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 22.82% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.48% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.01% | 1.11% | -0.01% | 0.93% | 2.20% | 1.85% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and TBLL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017 | -0.05 |
The correlation between VEA and TBLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VEA vs. TBLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
TBLL
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VEA
TBLL
Industrials
VEA
TBLL
-
Technology
VEA
TBLL
-
Healthcare
VEA
TBLL
-
Basic Materials
VEA
TBLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
TBLL
-
Consumer Defensive
VEA
TBLL
-
Energy
VEA
TBLL
-
Communication Services
VEA
TBLL
-
Utilities
VEA
TBLL
-
Real Estate
VEA
TBLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. TBLL — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
TBLL
VEA vs. TBLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -214.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 102.42 | -101.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 414.75 | -412.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 3,515.41 | -3,506.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 20.94 | -19.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 7.56 | -7.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 4.26 | -4.03 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. TBLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than TBLL's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and TBLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -0.63% | -60.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -0.01% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -0.36% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -0.36% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | 0.00% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -0.14% | -13.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.00% | +3.00% |
Volatility
VEA vs. TBLL - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) at 0.04%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 0.04% | +5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 0.12% | +13.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 0.19% | +15.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 0.45% | +16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 0.56% | +16.84% |
VEA vs. TBLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TBLL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEA vs. TBLL - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than TBLL's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and TBLL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to TBLL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs TBLL's -0.63%.
On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.09% vs 3.36% for TBLL. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TBLL is Ultrashort Bond. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and TBLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer