PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. LTCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. LTCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than LTCN's -43.96% return.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

LTCN

1D
4.81%
1M
-24.48%
YTD
-43.96%
6M
-51.98%
1Y
-52.19%
3Y*
-6.26%
5Y*
-56.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. LTCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%14.03%
LTCN
Grayscale Litecoin Trust
-43.96%-54.37%-18.79%650.00%-77.17%-96.84%731.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and LTCN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. LTCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LTCN
LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. LTCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEALTCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.89

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

-0.73

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

-1.20

+10.58

VEA vs. LTCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the LTCN Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and LTCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEALTCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

-0.75

+2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

-0.54

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.20

+0.44

Drawdowns

VEA vs. LTCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum LTCN drawdown of -99.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and LTCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEALTCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-99.58%

+38.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-71.62%

+59.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-93.36%

+79.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-98.89%

+69.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-99.35%

+95.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-89.63%

+76.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

43.63%

-40.63%

Volatility

VEA vs. LTCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.03%, while Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEALTCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

14.56%

-8.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

41.57%

-27.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

70.10%

-53.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

106.33%

-89.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

141.32%

-123.92%

VEA vs. LTCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LTCN's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. LTCN - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while LTCN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTCN
Grayscale Litecoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and LTCN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTCN has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs LTCN's -99.58%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.09% vs -56.75% for LTCN. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.09% return vs -56.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for LTCN.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LTCN is Cryptocurrency. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while LTCN tracks CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 2.50% for LTCN.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and LTCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer