VEA vs. GDX
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.14%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for GDX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
VEA vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
VEA vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and GDX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.34 |
The correlation between VEA and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VEA vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
GDX
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VEA
GDX
-
Industrials
VEA
GDX
-
Technology
VEA
GDX
-
Healthcare
VEA
GDX
-
Basic Materials
VEA
GDX
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
VEA
GDX
-
Energy
VEA
GDX
-
Communication Services
VEA
GDX
-
Utilities
VEA
GDX
-
Real Estate
VEA
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
GDX
VEA vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.68 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 4.32 | +5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.16 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.47 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.35 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -80.34% | +19.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -32.09% | +20.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -32.09% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -46.51% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -49.79% | +14.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -32.09% | +28.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -40.43% | +27.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 12.42% | -9.42% |
Volatility
VEA vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.03%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 16.05% | -10.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 38.61% | -24.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 46.36% | -30.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 36.61% | -19.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 37.27% | -19.87% |
VEA vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than GDX's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and GDX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 12.82% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GDX is Gold. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.51% for GDX.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer