PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while IEFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IEFV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 40.95% return, which is significantly higher than IEFV.L's 11.85% return.


VDPG.L

1D
0.35%
1M
0.12%
YTD
40.95%
6M
45.03%
1Y
73.19%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*

IEFV.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.20%
YTD
11.85%
6M
14.76%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VDPG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
40.95%30.58%-3.06%4.10%-1.89%1.95%15.56%-19.58%
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
11.85%42.20%5.40%11.41%1.47%18.58%-3.74%3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VDPG.L and IEFV.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.65

The correlation between VDPG.L and IEFV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDPG.L
IEFV.L

Technology

30.2%
12.1%

Financial Services

25.3%
22.6%

Industrials

12.5%
17.4%

Basic Materials

9.5%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
6.6%

Real Estate

4.9%
0.7%

Healthcare

3.3%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
8.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.8%

Energy

2.3%
5.0%

Utilities

2.0%
4.4%

Technology

VDPG.L
30.2%
IEFV.L
12.1%

Financial Services

VDPG.L
25.3%
IEFV.L
22.6%

Industrials

VDPG.L
12.5%
IEFV.L
17.4%

Basic Materials

VDPG.L
9.5%
IEFV.L
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VDPG.L
5.3%
IEFV.L
6.6%

Real Estate

VDPG.L
4.9%
IEFV.L
0.7%

Healthcare

VDPG.L
3.3%
IEFV.L
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

VDPG.L
2.5%
IEFV.L
8.6%

Communication Services

VDPG.L
2.4%
IEFV.L
3.8%

Energy

VDPG.L
2.3%
IEFV.L
5.0%

Utilities

VDPG.L
2.0%
IEFV.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPG.L
VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDPG.LIEFV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.46

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

3.19

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.65

11.73

+7.92

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPG.L and IEFV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDPG.LIEFV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

2.54

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.84

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.56

-0.19

Drawdowns

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, which is greater than IEFV.L's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and IEFV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDPG.LIEFV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.69%

-34.64%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-10.57%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.18%

-15.02%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-16.16%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.06%

-1.66%

-7.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.25%

-6.21%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

2.88%

+0.83%

Volatility

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) at 3.71%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDPG.LIEFV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

3.71%

+8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

10.75%

+8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.40%

13.32%

+8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

17.08%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

17.63%

+5.61%

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDPG.L vs. IEFV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDPG.L nor IEFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VDPG.L and IEFV.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.

VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IEFV.L is Europe Equities. VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.25% for IEFV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and IEFV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer