VDE vs. VFH
VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDE returned 9.47%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for VFH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
VDE vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 31.33% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 9.47%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 31.33%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
VFH
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
VDE vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 31.33% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -4.26% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDE and VFH is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VDE and VFH has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VDE vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDE
VFH
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
VDE
VFH
-
Basic Materials
VDE
VFH
-
Industrials
VDE
VFH
Communication Services
VDE
-
VFH
Consumer Cyclical
VDE
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
VDE
-
VFH
-
Financial Services
VDE
-
VFH
Healthcare
VDE
-
VFH
Real Estate
VDE
-
VFH
Technology
VDE
-
VFH
Utilities
VDE
-
VFH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDE vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
VDE
VFH
VDE vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.06 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 0.28 | +3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 0.74 | +10.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 0.28 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.45 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.56 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.24 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
VDE vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.20% | -78.61% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -14.75% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -17.30% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -25.66% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.29% | -44.42% | -24.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -7.17% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -18.53% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 5.60% | -1.52% |
Volatility
VDE vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.28%. This indicates that VDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 4.28% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 11.34% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | 14.98% | +5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 19.34% | +7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 22.56% | +7.37% |
VDE vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VDE and VFH have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDE vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than VFH's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.39% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDE and VFH have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to VFH (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 9.47% for VDE. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE and VFH have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.53% for VFH.
VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VFH is Financials Equities. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDE and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer