VDC vs. VAW
VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 7.63%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VAW. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VAW.
Performance
VDC vs. VAW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than VAW's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 7.63%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
VDC
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
VAW
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VDC vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 7.19% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 9.07% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDC and VAW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and VAW has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VDC vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDC
VAW
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
VDC
VAW
Consumer Cyclical
VDC
VAW
Industrials
VDC
VAW
Basic Materials
VDC
VAW
Healthcare
VDC
VAW
Communication Services
VDC
-
VAW
-
Energy
VDC
-
VAW
Financial Services
VDC
-
VAW
-
Real Estate
VDC
-
VAW
-
Technology
VDC
-
VAW
Utilities
VDC
-
VAW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDC vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank
VDC
VAW
VDC vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDC | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.34 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 4.32 | -3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDC | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.01 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.27 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.47 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.39 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
VDC vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum VAW drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and VAW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDC | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | -62.17% | +27.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -13.42% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -23.21% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.55% | -25.50% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.31% | -41.13% | +15.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -7.27% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -9.63% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 4.14% | +0.39% |
Volatility
VDC vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.47%, while Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDC | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 5.94% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 14.18% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 17.88% | -5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 19.65% | -6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 21.22% | -6.57% |
VDC vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDC vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison
VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than VAW's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.14% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDC and VAW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAW has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to VDC (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs VAW's -62.17%.
On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 9.87% vs 7.63% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.41% for VAW.
VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VAW is Materials. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.10% for VAW.
VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDC and VAW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer