PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 14.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 7.63%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.71% annualized return.


VDC

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
7.19%
6M
7.44%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
7.63%

SSO

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
14.49%
6M
14.11%
1Y
45.16%
3Y*
35.32%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
23.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
7.19%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
14.49%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and SSO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and SSO has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VDC vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
SSO

Consumer Defensive

97.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
10.1%

Industrials

0.3%
8.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.5%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.5%
SSO
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.8%
SSO
10.1%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
SSO
8.3%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.3%
SSO
1.8%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
SSO
8.5%

Communication Services

VDC

-

SSO
11.2%

Energy

VDC

-

SSO
3.5%

Financial Services

VDC

-

SSO
11.8%

Real Estate

VDC

-

SSO
1.9%

Technology

VDC

-

SSO
35.6%

Utilities

VDC

-

SSO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDCSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

2.50

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

10.89

-9.99

VDC vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDCSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.88

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.56

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.66

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.41

+0.26

Drawdowns

VDC vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-84.67%

+50.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-18.17%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-35.21%

+23.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-46.73%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-59.34%

+34.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-5.43%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-19.56%

+15.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

4.16%

+0.37%

Volatility

VDC vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.47%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

7.49%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

18.61%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

24.14%

-11.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

33.73%

-20.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

35.94%

-21.29%

VDC vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDC vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than SSO's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.64%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.14%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and SSO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSO has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to VDC (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.71% vs 7.63% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.71% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.64% for SSO.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.87% for SSO.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer