VDC vs. RYMTX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and RYMTX (Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while RYMTX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 7.63%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for RYMTX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for RYMTX.

Performance

VDC vs. RYMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VDC having a 7.19% return and RYMTX slightly lower at 7.07%. Over the past 10 years, VDC has outperformed RYMTX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while RYMTX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.51% annualized return.

VDC

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 7.19%
• 6M: 7.44%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: 8.08%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: 7.63%

RYMTX

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 17.81%
• 3Y*: 3.95%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. RYMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	7.19%	2.17%	13.30%	2.38%	-1.79%	17.64%	10.86%	26.11%	-7.79%	11.85%
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund	7.07%	5.52%	0.56%	3.62%	14.75%	2.62%	2.07%	7.18%	-7.87%	7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and RYMTX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.10

Return for Risk

VDC vs. RYMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC

VDC Risk / Return Rank: 14
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 14
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 14

RYMTX

RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 51
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. RYMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VDC	RYMTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	1.58	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	2.18	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.30	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	3.27	-2.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.90	12.34	-11.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VDC vs. RYMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the RYMTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and RYMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VDC	RYMTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	1.58	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.45	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.33	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.09	+0.58

Drawdowns

VDC vs. RYMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, roughly equal to the maximum RYMTX drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and RYMTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDC	RYMTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.24%	-34.19%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-5.43%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.78%	-17.54%	+5.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.55%	-17.54%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.31%	-17.54%	-7.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.27%	-2.73%	-4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-18.89%	+15.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	1.44%	+3.09%

Volatility

VDC vs. RYMTX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) at 2.20%. This indicates that VDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDC	RYMTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	2.20%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	8.60%	+1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43%	11.21%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.15%	12.17%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.65%	10.65%	+4.00%

VDC vs. RYMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMTX's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

VDC vs. RYMTX - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than RYMTX's 5.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund	5.63%	6.03%	5.10%	1.02%	4.80%	0.00%	7.56%	0.00%	0.00%	4.70%	5.19%	2.68%
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	2.14%	2.26%	2.33%	2.65%	2.37%	2.14%	2.50%	2.44%	2.78%	2.52%	2.39%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDC and RYMTX in my portfolio?

VDC and RYMTX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VDC or RYMTX?

VDC has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to RYMTX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs RYMTX's -34.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYMTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.