VDC vs. DGP
VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and DGP (DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while DGP is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 7.63%/yr vs 19.21%/yr for DGP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DGP.
Performance
VDC vs. DGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than DGP's -4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed DGP with an annualized return of 7.63%, while DGP has yielded a comparatively higher 19.21% annualized return.
VDC
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
DGP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -16.73%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 52.74%
- 3Y*
- 53.91%
- 5Y*
- 29.00%
- 10Y*
- 19.21%
VDC vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 7.19% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | -4.85% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | -7.48% | 24.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDC and DGP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDC vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank
VDC
DGP
VDC vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDC | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.43 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 3.59 | -2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDC | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.00 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.75 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.27 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
VDC vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum DGP drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and DGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDC | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | -75.31% | +41.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -36.98% | +27.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -36.98% | +25.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.55% | -51.24% | +34.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.31% | -51.24% | +25.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -36.69% | +29.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -41.09% | +37.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 14.75% | -10.22% |
Volatility
VDC vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.47%, while DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDC | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 10.97% | -6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 46.99% | -37.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 53.01% | -40.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 38.91% | -25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 35.11% | -20.46% |
VDC vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DGP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDC vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison
VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.14% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDC and DGP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGP has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to VDC (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs DGP's -75.31%.
On 10-year performance, DGP leads with 19.21% vs 7.63% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGP has performed better with a 19.21% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGP.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for DGP.
VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while DGP is Leveraged Commodities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.75% for DGP.
DGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDC and DGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer