VDADX vs. AOM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VDADX (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares) and AOM (iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF) are both funds - VDADX is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while AOM is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Moderate. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDADX returned 13.05%/yr vs 6.19%/yr for AOM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDADX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AOM.

Performance

VDADX vs. AOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDADX achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's 4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VDADX has outperformed AOM with an annualized return of 13.05%, while AOM has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.

VDADX

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 6.41%
• 1Y: 18.22%
• 3Y*: 16.23%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 13.05%

AOM

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 4.18%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 13.33%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: 4.61%
• 10Y*: 6.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDADX vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VDADX Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares	6.53%	14.17%	16.99%	14.44%	-9.80%	23.59%	15.47%	29.68%	-2.06%	22.22%
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	4.18%	13.28%	7.95%	12.38%	-14.54%	6.93%	10.02%	15.58%	-3.88%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VDADX and AOM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2013	0.79

The correlation between VDADX and AOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

VDADX vs. AOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VDADX	AOM
Technology	26.2%	27.9%
Financial Services	20.6%	16.1%
Healthcare	16.5%	8.0%
Industrials	11.8%	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	9.5%
Energy	3.5%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.5%	4.2%
Utilities	3.2%	2.7%
Communication Services	0.5%	8.1%
Real Estate	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

VDADX vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDADX

VDADX Risk / Return Rank: 44
VDADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
VDADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
VDADX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VDADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
VDADX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

AOM

AOM Risk / Return Rank: 66
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDADX vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VDADX	AOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.00	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.84	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.37	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.62	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	11.37	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VDADX vs. AOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDADX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the AOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDADX and AOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VDADX	AOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	2.00	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.57	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.78	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.69	+0.07

Drawdowns

VDADX vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDADX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDADX and AOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDADX	AOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-19.96%	-11.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.93%	-5.11%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	-6.85%	-8.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.42%	-19.96%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.70%	-19.96%	-11.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.24%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-2.70%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.18%	+0.78%

Volatility

VDADX vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 2.40%. This indicates that VDADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDADX	AOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	2.40%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.70%	5.42%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	6.72%	+3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.28%	8.17%	+6.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.20%	7.95%	+8.25%

VDADX vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDADX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VDADX vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison

VDADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than AOM's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	3.01%	2.98%	3.10%	2.79%	2.27%	1.56%	2.02%	2.66%	2.53%	3.31%	2.14%	1.98%
VDADX Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares	1.46%	1.60%	1.71%	1.86%	1.94%	1.53%	1.61%	1.69%	2.07%	1.88%	2.14%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDADX and AOM in my portfolio?

VDADX and AOM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VDADX or AOM?

VDADX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to AOM (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDADX dropped -31.70% vs AOM's -19.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.