PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCSH vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VCSH is traded in USD, while XIU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XIU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCSH achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 7.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VCSH has underperformed XIU.TO with an annualized return of 2.66%, while XIU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.


VCSH

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
2.66%

XIU.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
7.79%
6M
10.88%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.44%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
7.73%35.06%11.31%14.58%-11.93%28.12%7.83%27.04%-14.97%17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VCSH and XIU.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.07

Over the past year, VCSH and XIU.TO have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCSH vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCSHXIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.55

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

15.31

-1.90

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCSH and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCSHXIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.25

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.78

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.72

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.39

+0.62

Drawdowns

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCSH drawdown since its inception was -12.86%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCSH and XIU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCSHXIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-59.23%

+46.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-8.10%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-12.38%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.48%

-24.07%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

-40.99%

+28.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-1.98%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-10.95%

+9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.88%

-1.54%

Volatility

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) is 0.61%, while iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that VCSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCSHXIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

3.91%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

9.99%

-8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

12.80%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

14.47%

-11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

16.46%

-13.11%

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCSH has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XIU.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCSH vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

VCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than XIU.TO's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
2.21%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCSH and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XIU.TO.

VCSH is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. VCSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index, while XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCSH and 0.18% for XIU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCSH and XIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer