PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCR vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCR vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's -1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 13.45%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.


VCR

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
-1.82%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
13.45%

VHT

1D
-0.29%
1M
5.33%
YTD
-1.21%
6M
0.70%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCR vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.82%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-1.21%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VCR and VHT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between VCR and VHT has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCR vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCR vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRVHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.20

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.59

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

3.95

-1.94

VCR vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCR and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.13

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.32

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.57

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.57

-0.06

Drawdowns

VCR vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.54%

-39.12%

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-10.40%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-16.91%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-17.71%

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

-28.85%

-10.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-4.34%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-5.99%

-3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

4.17%

+0.84%

Volatility

VCR vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.90%. This indicates that VCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

4.90%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

10.45%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

14.64%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

15.02%

+8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

16.97%

+5.45%

VCR vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCR vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than VHT's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.74%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.66%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCR and VHT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCR has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to VHT (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs VHT's -39.12%.

On 10-year performance, VCR leads with 13.45% vs 9.66% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCR has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VCR.

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.74% for VCR.

VCR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCR and 0.09% for VHT.

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCR and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer