PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCR vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCR vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly higher than META's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has underperformed META with an annualized return of 13.45%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.


VCR

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
-1.82%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
13.45%

META

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCR vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.82%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-11.24%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VCR and META is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.52

The correlation between VCR and META has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCR vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCR vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.94

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

-0.48

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

-1.01

+3.02

VCR vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCR and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-0.45

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.28

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.46

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.54

-0.04

Drawdowns

VCR vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.54%

-76.74%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-33.30%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-34.15%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-76.74%

+37.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

-76.74%

+37.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-25.73%

+19.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-15.26%

+5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

15.69%

-10.68%

Volatility

VCR vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) is 5.30%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that VCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

10.48%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

26.95%

-13.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

35.56%

-17.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

44.05%

-20.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

38.69%

-16.27%

Dividends

VCR vs. META - Dividend Comparison

VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than META's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.74%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCR and META have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to VCR (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs META's -76.74%.

VCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCR and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer