VCLT vs. TMRAF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index, while TMRAF (Tomra Systems ASA) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VCLT returned 2.14%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for TMRAF. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VCLT vs. TMRAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCLT achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than TMRAF's -25.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VCLT has underperformed TMRAF with an annualized return of 2.14%, while TMRAF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.

VCLT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.62%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: -0.19%
• 1Y: 6.74%
• 3Y*: 4.19%
• 5Y*: -2.13%
• 10Y*: 2.14%

TMRAF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: -25.51%
• 6M: -19.86%
• 1Y: -34.94%
• 3Y*: -12.47%
• 5Y*: -9.57%
• 10Y*: 13.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCLT vs. TMRAF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.19%	7.18%	-1.90%	11.17%	-25.50%	-1.73%	13.27%	23.89%	-7.04%	11.70%
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA	-25.51%	7.13%	13.87%	-32.05%	-27.02%	50.97%	51.54%	46.27%	48.12%	82.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VCLT and TMRAF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009	0.02

Return for Risk

VCLT vs. TMRAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCLT

VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 26
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

TMRAF

TMRAF Risk / Return Rank: 13
TMRAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TMRAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TMRAF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TMRAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TMRAF Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCLT vs. TMRAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VCLT	TMRAF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	-0.66	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	-0.72	+1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.86	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	-0.74	+2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.15	-1.38	+4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VCLT vs. TMRAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the TMRAF Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCLT and TMRAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VCLT	TMRAF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	-0.66	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	-0.16	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.28	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.21	+0.17

Drawdowns

VCLT vs. TMRAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCLT drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum TMRAF drawdown of -71.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCLT and TMRAF.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCLT	TMRAF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.31%	-71.64%	+37.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.25%	-47.39%	+42.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-56.94%	+43.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.31%	-71.64%	+37.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.31%	-71.64%	+37.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.03%	-59.61%	+44.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-20.64%	+12.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	25.28%	-23.14%

Volatility

VCLT vs. TMRAF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) is 2.27%, while Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a volatility of 19.65%. This indicates that VCLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VCLT	TMRAF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	19.65%	-17.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.80%	40.54%	-34.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.88%	53.41%	-45.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.77%	58.64%	-45.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.85%	49.89%	-37.04%

Dividends

VCLT vs. TMRAF - Dividend Comparison

VCLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than TMRAF's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA	0.23%	1.55%	1.39%	1.49%	1.94%	1.01%	0.62%	1.62%	4.28%	13.33%	0.00%	0.00%
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF	5.59%	5.51%	5.19%	4.67%	4.44%	3.07%	3.16%	3.81%	4.55%	4.01%	4.33%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCLT and TMRAF in my portfolio?

VCLT and TMRAF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VCLT or TMRAF?

TMRAF has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to VCLT (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCLT dropped -34.31% vs TMRAF's -71.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VCLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.