PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCIT vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCIT vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 8.45% return.


VCIT

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
0.06%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
2.85%

BBUS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.40%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
-0.26%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%9.97%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
8.45%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and BBUS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.25

The correlation between VCIT and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCIT vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCITBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.65

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

12.09

-5.43

VCIT vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCITBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.02

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.77

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.82

-0.07

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCITBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-35.35%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-9.21%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-19.01%

+12.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

-25.46%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-2.68%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-5.45%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

2.02%

-1.12%

Volatility

VCIT vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) is 1.39%, while JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that VCIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCITBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

3.78%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

9.37%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

12.15%

-8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

17.07%

-10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

19.60%

-13.32%

VCIT vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCIT vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.82%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCIT and BBUS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to VCIT (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.01% vs 1.04% for VCIT. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for VCIT.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

VCIT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VCIT and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCIT and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer