PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.92% annualized return.


VBR

1D
0.16%
1M
0.48%
YTD
11.45%
6M
12.14%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.50%

SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.45%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and SMH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.64

The correlation between VBR and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VBR vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
SMH

Industrials

18.1%

-

Financial Services

17.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Technology

10.6%
100.0%

Real Estate

10.1%

-

Healthcare

7.9%

-

Basic Materials

6.3%

-

Energy

5.2%

-

Utilities

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Industrials

VBR
18.1%
SMH

-

Financial Services

VBR
17.6%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.4%
SMH

-

Technology

VBR
10.6%
SMH
100.0%

Real Estate

VBR
10.1%
SMH

-

Healthcare

VBR
7.9%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

VBR
6.3%
SMH

-

Energy

VBR
5.2%
SMH

-

Utilities

VBR
4.8%
SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
SMH

-

Communication Services

VBR
2.5%
SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBRSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.62

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

9.26

-6.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

34.80

-24.86

VBR vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBRSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

4.27

-2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

1.08

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

1.13

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.33

+0.09

Drawdowns

VBR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-84.96%

+22.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-14.93%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-35.74%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-45.30%

+21.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-45.30%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-6.23%

+5.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-41.07%

+32.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.96%

-1.45%

Volatility

VBR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.67%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

15.45%

-11.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

26.71%

-16.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

32.42%

-17.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

35.32%

-15.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

32.75%

-11.01%

VBR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and SMH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 10.50% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer