PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. SCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.


VBR

1D
0.16%
1M
0.48%
YTD
11.45%
6M
12.14%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.50%

SCZ

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
7.96%
6M
10.42%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
8.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.45%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
7.96%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and SCZ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.72

The correlation between VBR and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBR vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
SCZ

Industrials

18.1%
24.6%

Financial Services

17.6%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
11.8%

Technology

10.6%
9.1%

Real Estate

10.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

7.9%
5.5%

Basic Materials

6.3%
10.7%

Energy

5.2%
3.7%

Utilities

4.8%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.5%
4.1%

Industrials

VBR
18.1%
SCZ
24.6%

Financial Services

VBR
17.6%
SCZ
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.4%
SCZ
11.8%

Technology

VBR
10.6%
SCZ
9.1%

Real Estate

VBR
10.1%
SCZ
10.3%

Healthcare

VBR
7.9%
SCZ
5.5%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.3%
SCZ
10.7%

Energy

VBR
5.2%
SCZ
3.7%

Utilities

VBR
4.8%
SCZ
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
SCZ
5.0%

Communication Services

VBR
2.5%
SCZ
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBRSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

1.89

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

7.18

+2.76

VBR vs. SCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and SCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBRSCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.47

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.28

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.26

+0.15

Drawdowns

VBR vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and SCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-61.86%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-11.43%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-15.06%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-36.87%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-41.07%

-4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-3.23%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-13.06%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.00%

-0.49%

Volatility

VBR vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.67%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.69%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

12.26%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

14.71%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

16.78%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

17.45%

+4.29%

VBR vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBR vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than SCZ's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.05%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and SCZ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCZ has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs SCZ's -61.86%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.50% vs 8.12% for SCZ. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.76% for VBR.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.40% for SCZ.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and SCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer