VBR vs. SCHP
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.50%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
VBR vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
VBR vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 11.45% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and SCHP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.07 |
The correlation between VBR and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VBR vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
SCHP
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
VBR
SCHP
-
Financial Services
VBR
SCHP
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
SCHP
Technology
VBR
SCHP
-
Real Estate
VBR
SCHP
-
Healthcare
VBR
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
VBR
SCHP
-
Energy
VBR
SCHP
-
Utilities
VBR
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
VBR
SCHP
-
Communication Services
VBR
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
SCHP
VBR vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBR | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.50 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 7.59 | +2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBR | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.47 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.17 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.45 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.50 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
VBR vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -14.26% | -47.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -1.93% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -4.48% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -14.26% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -14.26% | -31.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.89% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -3.93% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 0.63% | +1.88% |
Volatility
VBR vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that VBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 1.00% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 2.24% | +8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.16% | 3.29% | +11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 6.12% | +13.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 5.59% | +16.15% |
VBR vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBR vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBR and SCHP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBR has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.50% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 1.76% for VBR.
VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.03% for SCHP.
VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer