VBR vs. IVV
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.50%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
VBR vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 10.50%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
VBR vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 11.45% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and IVV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VBR and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VBR vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
IVV
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
VBR
IVV
Financial Services
VBR
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
IVV
Technology
VBR
IVV
Real Estate
VBR
IVV
Healthcare
VBR
IVV
Basic Materials
VBR
IVV
Energy
VBR
IVV
Utilities
VBR
IVV
Consumer Defensive
VBR
IVV
Communication Services
VBR
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
IVV
VBR vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBR | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.81 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 12.97 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBR | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.07 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.85 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
VBR vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -55.25% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.89% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -18.75% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -24.53% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -33.90% | -11.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -2.67% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -10.77% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.92% | +0.59% |
Volatility
VBR vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 3.77% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 9.31% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.16% | 12.08% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 16.92% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 18.07% | +3.67% |
VBR vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBR vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBR and IVV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 10.50% for VBR. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer